Objection to the judges of the Audio Leaks Inquiry Commission in Islamabad

Chehra WebDesk Chehra WebDesk

Objection to the judges of the Audio Leaks Inquiry Commission in Islamabad

Objection to the judges of the Audio Leaks Inquiry Commission in Islamabad

A detailed decision containing 32 pages was issued

The decision was written by the Chief Justice of Pakistan

The objections raised against the three judges have no significance in the eyes of law

A bench objection petition is filed to harass a member of the bench rather than in good faith

Delayed by using

The federal government delayed the court decisions by various tricks and tactics and contempt of court was done.

The series of contempt of court started from March 1, 2023 when it was said that by a majority of four to three, the petition of the Speaker was rejected

Instead of challenging the April 4 decision, the federal government hid behind the Election Commission's review appeal

His purpose was to justify his inaction

The court noted that the federal government used various tactics

Parliament then passed the Supreme Court Rev. of Judgment and Orders Act,

The Review of Judgment and Orders Act has been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court

The federal government has filed petitions to remove judges from several constitutional cases

Filed an application in the Audio Leak Commission on the same frivolous grounds of conflict of interest and bias

The purpose of filing the objection petition against the audio leaks case was to separate the Chief Justice of Pakistan from the bench

The federal ministers made rhetoric against the judges who were heard at different places

Federal Ministers made inflammatory statements on public forums in the case against elections in Provincial Assemblies

The purpose of the minister's provocative statements was to reinforce the federal government's agenda

The Supreme Court tolerated these cases of the federal government with great restraint and patience

A final judicial decision must be binding on a court decision

Consequences are given in the Constitution for not implementing the decision

The miscellaneous petition is an attack on the Judiciary

The miscellaneous application is rejected

The miscellaneous petition filed against the judges of the bench was filed for nefarious purposes