Isn't it a democratic tradition to protest?
A Chaudhry, a Khan, a Wadira, a Nawab, a
Sardar and even a common man does not allow the thought and idea to develop
that he listens to opposition.
Raise objections, raise questions, raise the
knowledge of the truth.
Raise your voice against the outdated
traditional society. What kind of system is this? I don't understand, where
those who love democracy don't get tired of saying democracy. Those who speak
against the dictatorship.
When will those who play with human behavior
and emotions fulfill the moral requirements of being human?
It has been a tradition of Sindh Assembly that
most of the politicians have been elected here for generations. Despite this,
why is the democratic attitude not the end?
Why did this attitude of slave and master
happen?
Educated. Those who live in the best countries
and get higher education from there are also supporters of this thought and
idea. How can such a system talk about improvement, how can it talk about
change and good.
During the swearing-in ceremony in the Sindh
Assembly yesterday, the women of the GDA
protested the way the Sindh police grabbed them by the hair, dragged them,
threw them into the police car, and slapped them. Actually this slap has hit
the thinking of this society which accepts this slavery generation after
generation without doing anything to change and improve and bring new
candidate.
We can proudly say that in this suffocating
environment, someone came out of the house for the right and truth.
Raise your voice and shout, against this
filthy and smelly system where people of your choice have been elected masters.
No one badmouthed him on the video of the
beating of women.
This means that what is going on, let it go
on, why should we put ourselves in trouble, create our own opponents, how
selfish we are, how insensitive we are. It is not called right.